China: Threat and Opportunity
- JIM STODDER, The
Hartford Courant, September 23, 2007
Everyone is trying to figure out what China means for the West. New business opportunities in the East? More
poverty in the West? A rival superpower?
Jack London asked all of these questions a century
ago. Already famous for tales of the Alaskan gold rush, the 28-year-old author
was hired by the Hearst newspapers in 1904 to cover the war between Russia and
Japan. London, who loved boxing, was now ringside for a major defeat of a
European country by non-Europeans - the first since the fall of Constantinople
in 1453.
This Asian triumph came at the same time
immigration was leading to anti-Chinese riots in California. In this climate,
London sent home a 1904 essay titled "The Yellow Peril" - predicting
that the Chinese might one day inherit the earth.
Three years later, in 1907, he wrote a science
fiction story called "The Unparalleled Invasion," in which he made
two accurate predictions about China's future.
First, he predicted that Japan would invade China,
but eventually be expelled. The Japanese invasion came in 1931,
15 years after London's death, and their expulsion came at the end of WWII.
More important was his second prediction. He saw
that China would industrialize in the 20th century, and that its vast supply of
cheap and disciplined labor would again make it what it had been for millennia
before - the world's greatest economic power by far. London wrote that:
"China ... entertained no dreams of conquest.
The Chinese [were] not an imperial race. .. [they
were] industrious, thrifty, and peace-loving. War was looked upon as an
unpleasant but necessary task that at times must be performed. And so, while the Western races had squabbled and fought ... China
had calmly gone on working at her machines and growing."
Until, in his story, it becomes the largest
economy on earth. And at current rates of growth, China's GDP will in fact
surpass the United States by mid-century.
The finale to London's prediction is horrific: The
Western powers, terrified by China's new power, wipe out its population with
biological warfare. London may not have approved of such genocide, but there is
no question that he saw the "yellow peril" as a threat to the West.
Despite this ugly racism, Jack London's story
captures two faces of globalization: the promise of amazing growth in the East,
and the West's shock of relative decline.
First the bright side: Most of humanity is
escaping from poverty. World Bank figures show that from 1981 to 2004, people
living in extreme poverty (less than $1 a day) fell from 33 to 15 percent of
world population. Those in moderate poverty (less than $2 a day) fell from 54
to 40 percent.
Nowhere was this faster than in China, where extreme
poverty declined from 64 percent to 10 percent, and moderate poverty dropped
from 84 percent to 35 percent over the same period. Never before has there been
such rapid improvement in human well-being.
Quite a few foreigners are getting rich in China
as well. While in China on business last month, I visited luxury hotels and
conference centers swarming with business people from all over the world. This
is a gold rush - China's industrialization has produced the greatest increase
in absolute world wealth ever.
Meanwhile, however, there has been a decline in
U.S. relative wealth - and its correlates, our political and military power.
This is the downside of globalization, for us.
In the long run, we need to keep our military
strong, and have much better incentives for environmental protection. But our
most immediate need is for a more generous safety net - for the victims of
trade.
If free trade really is good for the country as a
whole - as we economists argue - then it ought to be possible to make it good
for the whole country. But don't do it with tariffs - they cut off the benefits
of trade for everyone. Do it with subsidies targeted to those hurt by trade.
In Scandinavian countries, where such subsidies
are much more generous, surveys by Harvard's Dani Rodrik and others show that more people are in favor of
globalization. Recognizing what is good for their people as a whole, Scandinavians are willing to protect the inevitable
losers.
We need to do the same - not out of
kindheartedness, but to protect our overall gains from trade. We cannot expect
millions of workers to willingly sacrifice their jobs upon the altar of
globalism just so the rest of us can enjoy higher living standards.
The United States economy has grown faster than
the rest of the world for most of two centuries. But not
anymore. The poor world is now growing much faster than the rich world.
The combined GDP of the developing world, led by China and India, grew 7
percent in 2006 - more than twice as fast as the GDP of the rich countries,
according to the World Bank.
If world poverty is to be conquered anytime this
century, this very rapid growth for the poor must continue. We in the U.S. can
get richer by investing, helping the world's poor - the vast majority of our
planet - to work smarter and better. China is showing us how great our world's
potential is.
We must not let our fear of a resurgent Asia cut
us off from this immense engine of wealth creation. Let's be constructive - and
go get a bigger piece of that wealth.
Jim Stodder, an economist at Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute at Hartford, recently returned from Beijing and Tianjin,
China, where he taught a course on risk management.
Copyright © 2007, The
Hartford Courant